Rules by country
Slot Mechanics

Hold and win, hold and spin, link and win: one 2014 mechanic under thirty trade names

Guide Last updated Full archive
Slot Mechanics

If you have ever wondered why Link & Win, Hold & Spin, Cash Collect, Fire Link, Power Hold and a dozen others behave identically, the answer is that they are the same mechanic under trade names — and the original has a date, a game and a designer.

Slot spec sheet: three reels and the parameter list we fill in for every game
Slot spec sheet: three reels and the parameter list we fill in for every game
On this page
  1. What the different names usually signal
  2. The four questions that actually separate two hold-and-win games
  3. Why this matters more than it looks
  4. Related mechanics that are not this
  5. Sources

The feature arrived in 2014 in Aristocrat's Lightning Link, credited to Scott Olive of the High Roller Gaming studio in Australia. The behaviour that every later version copies is simple to state: cash-value symbols land, they lock in place, and you are given a number of respins that resets each time another one lands. The round ends when the respins run out or the screen fills.

It spread because it works on a psychological level nothing else does. The player can see the state of the round, count the empty positions, and feel the near-miss on every respin. The mechanic is now generic enough that manufacturers pay into a patent pool for the right to ship their own versions of what the industry simply calls hold-and-spin.

What the different names usually signal

The names are not pure marketing — they tend to encode which variant was bolted on top of the core loop:

What none of the names tell you is the certified return figure or the maximum win. Those are properties of the specific build — see one slot, several RTP builds.

The four questions that actually separate two hold-and-win games

Reading the rules screen for these four things tells you more than any review of the theme:

Why this matters more than it looks

Hold-and-win games are frequently sold on the promise that the bonus is where the game lives — and in most of them the base game is deliberately thin, with a hit frequency that exists mainly to keep you present between rounds. That structure makes two things true at once: the feature is genuinely the product, and the wait for the feature is the cost. A game with a cheap-feeling base game and a spectacular feature is a high-variance game whatever the label says.

It also explains the single most common disappointment. Two games with the same feature name can have wildly different trigger rates, and the trigger rate is rarely printed. Where a studio publishes it, the rules screen is where it appears; where it does not, the honest answer is that it is not public, and a review that supplies a number without a source has invented one.

Two are constantly confused with hold-and-win. Respin-on-demand features, where the player pays to respin a single reel, are a purchase mechanic and restricted in several markets — see where bonus buy is not available. Sticky wild respins lock wilds rather than cash values, so the outcome still depends on the paytable rather than on the sum on screen.

The mechanics index is in Slot Mechanics; framework naming across studios is in licensed mechanics vs house mechanics.

Sources

Attribution read against the sources above on 27 September 2026. Trade names belong to their owners. Where a studio publishes trigger rates, the game's own rules screen takes precedence over this page.