authors:Nicki Dowling, Alun C. Jackson, Shane A. Thomas, Jane Elizabeth Tomnay, Harold Wynne
published in: 2009
summary: Most states and territories in Australia have adopted the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) of the Canadian Problem Gambling Index as the standard measure of problem gambling in their prevalence studies and research programs. However, notwithstanding this attempted standardisation, differences in sampling and recruitment methodologies and in some cases the modification of the scoring methods used in the PGSI have lead to substantial difficulties in comparison of the prevalence rates obtained in different studies. This paper focuses on how these two actions may significantly underestimate the true prevalence percent of problem gambling in Australian studies of the prevalence of problem gambling. It is recommended that the original and validated version of the PGSI is used in future Australian prevalence studies and that prevalence in community studies is studied across the whole community not arbitrarily restricted sub-samples. The adoption of valid scoring methods and unbiased sampling procedures will lead to more accurate and comparable prevalence studies.
related url: https://springerlink3.metapress.com/content/n724h44q77413...
Note: This link will take you to an external website. GambLib.org is not responsible for accessibility and content of external websites.
type: article in journal
is part of a publication: International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
original language: English
article pagination: start page: 570 - end page: 582
keywords: Canadian Problem Gambling Index , pathological gambling , prevalence , problem gambling , problem gambling severity index
- Article entered in GambLIB database on dec. 16. 2010, 12:12
- Item added by staff