author:James R. Westphal
published in: 2007
summary: Background Studies of clinical trials across the field of healthcare found use of designs that overestimate treatment effects. Objective review clinical trial designs used to develop gambling treatment evidence base for suitability to assess cause and effect and to accurately assess treatment effects. Methods literature review, grading of evidence, proportions and confidence limits Results The majority of published studies on gambling treatment are methodologically unsuited to determine treatment effects. Suitable (randomized and controlled) trails often use designs that can overestimate treatment effects. Attrition in published studies of gambling treatment is substantial, ranging from 11 to 83%. If attrition is not included in the analysis, overestimation of treatment effects may be similar in magnitude. Conclusions The current evidence may overestimate gambling treatment effects. The inclusion of intention to treat analysis, careful blinding, more equivalent control groups and measures of adherence to treatment would improve problem gambling treatment clinical trial design.
related url: http://www.springerlink.com/content/w66r4nn418m0w234/
Note: This link will take you to an external website. GambLib.org is not responsible for accessibility and content of external websites.
type: article in journal
publisher: Springer New York
is part of a publication: International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
original language: English
article pagination: start page: 65 - end page: 79
- ISSN: 1557-1874
keywords: evaluation , evidence based , problem gambling , treatment , treatment retention
- Article entered in GambLIB database on jan. 16. 2009, 19:01
- Item added by staff