Altering the DSM-III criteria for pathological gambling

  • author:

    Henry R. Lesieur
  • published in

    : 1988
  • summary

    : Following a critique and revision of the diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling in DSM-III, a field trial of the revised criteria was conducted. Four groups of individuals (762 in all) were surveyed: Gamblers Anonymous members, college students, hospital employees, and outpatients in treatment for pathological gambling. The revised criteria were found to discriminate effectively between pathological gamblers and others. In order to refine the cutoff point, the results on the DSM-III revision were compared to the South Oaks Gambling Screen, a valid, reliable instrument for screening pathological gamblers (Lesieur & Blume, 1987). A cutoff point of four or more items was found to be optimal in diagnosing pathological gamblers. This research was funded by the South Oaks Foundation, Amityville, New York. Special thanks are given Sheila Blume, M.D., Julian I. Taber, Ph.D. and Robert L. Custer, M.D. for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
  • related url


    Note: This link will take you to an external website. is not responsible for accessibility and content of external websites.

  • type

    : article in journal
  • publisher

    : Springer Netherlands
  • is part of a publication

    : Journal of Gambling Studies
  • volume

    : 4
  • issue

    : 1
  • original language

    : English
  • article pagination

    : start page: 38 - end page: 47
  • ISSN: 1050-5350
  • keywords

    : pathological gambling
  • Article entered in GambLIB database on nov. 24. 2008, 10:11
  • Item added by staff